Putting The Lie To Civilization

Korea Old and New: A History, p.129:

Ceramics occupied a special place in Yi dynasty art. In the early period pieces called punch’ong (“powder blue-green”) were produced, like Koryo celadon only with a glaze that had devolved toward an ashy blue-green tone.  This was a transition stage leading to the making of white porcelain (paekcha), a genre that departed from the smoothly curved shapes of Koryo celadon in favor of simpler, warmer lines.  These creations also stood on broader bases, resulting in more practical vessels that give the viewer a sense of sturdy repose.  This Yi dynasty ceramic ware, with its varying shadings of white ranging from pure white to milky to grayish hues, is said to constitute a fitting expression of the character of the yangban literati.


Nowhere but in the world of the antique is it more obvious that many of the things that we, as societies and individuals hold dear, are completely arbitrary.  I read the above passage, head buzzing with a single thought: How many writers removed are the above sentiments from actual knowledge about ceramics.  I think it’s a safe assumption that the many authors of Korea Old and New necessarily know more about Korean history than they do about ceramics, and yet here they are repeating that it ceramic ware of the period ‘is said to consitute a fitting expression of the character of the yangban literati’.  What does this mean, exactly?  The things that they held dear reflect the desires and values that they held?  Really, are you sure?  Furthermore, the slavish description of the varied hues of white in Choson porcelain indicates that this unevenness is something to be desired.  Why?  The only reason that we know that uneven whiteness was something to be desired is because that’s what the people who wanted fine porcelain ended up getting.

Why do we eat T-bone steaks?  Is it because it has a bone in it that is shaped like a T?  If one were to look back on this era and read about a T-bone steak, and in recalling that fine cut of meat they were to lavish attention on the imagery of the meat trisected by a widget of bone, and to attempt to describe the decision to order a T-bone in terms of the mind of the eater, would we accept the argument that the presence of the bone in the meat reflects the innermost essence of the minds of the times?  Perhaps.  But perhaps we would not.

And likewise, when we look at a surviving piece of ceramic ware from the Choson period, and we make ourselves aware of the standards by which the people of the period judged good pottery from bad, how deep should we go?  How much of the continued evolution of pottery from Koryo through the Choson period had anything to do with changing taste itself, and how much of it had to do with the unadorned desire for something new and rare?  Were the styles of the 1980s in any sense better than those of the 1970s?  Did they say something about the minds of the people of the period?  Undoubtedly they did.  Were they ‘a fitting expression of the character’ of the 1980s westerner?  I leave it to you to judge.

What I find most objectionable about passages like the above is that, yes, clearly the yangban of that period saw something in those ceramic designs that appealed to them on a deep level.  But to what extent do the writers of the present understand what it was about the pieces that moved the yangban?  How much of the appeal was aesthetic, and how much of it was simply the appeal of rarity?  People these days will pay more for a 100 year-old mint condition penny, a mass-produced piece of currency, than reason might dictate.  To what extent was this simple motivation to own something rare (and thus valuable) merely for its flawlessness motivating the ceramic collector of the Choson period?



~ by Joshing on April 6, 2010.

3 Responses to “Putting The Lie To Civilization”

  1. and how will historians of the future write about Korean culture of today? “This Ssangyong Chairman’s lines are stilted and not aerodynamic, and the car is unnecessarily wide and long, in order to look larger and more important than the smaller, more efficient cars. This affected inefficiency reflects the true elite character of Korea’s upper class; moreover, though it does not show anywhere in the car’s design or features, its price was inflated about 70% above its appraised market value, in order to make it less affordable, and be a true mark of success and wealth.”

    “This Louis Vuitton Handbag was $200 more expensive than the exact same product for sale in France, because Korean rich people like things to be unnecessarily expensive; this enhances the item’s value as a status symbol. Whereas the French of the time only paid through the nose for actual value, in Korea’s elite circles, the perceived value was just as important as the actual value. This demonstrates the true mind of Korea’s upper class after the rapid economic expansion…”

  2. Rob,


  3. Well ajosshi. I found you. what what.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: